close

policy

We would like to invite you to continue a survey you have started. ...

Do you trust your insurer ?

Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Insurance provides peace of mind
Insurance is purchased only when compulsory
Terms and Conditions (small print) are clear and easily accessible
Insurance jargon (language) stands in the way of fully understanding each policy
Insurance companies try their best to uphold the details of the policy without cutting corners
Reducing risk, cutting costs and profits are more important to an insurance company than the customer
Insurance companies in the region are as professional as in other more developed markets
Gender
Age group
Do you feel your insurance provider works in your interest?
Have you had a rejected claim that you feel was not justified?
Do you trust your insurance provider?
Our Network

Register for our free newsletter

 
 
Latest News

Big phat Indian weddings

Big phat Indian weddings

Kipp is a little startled by the fact that the $40 billion Indian Wedding Industry is unaffected by the recession and is still booming.

4

November 15, 2010 4:19 by



The Guardian headline “Wealthy Indians hire actors to masquerade as family wedding guests” caught our attention this afternoon for several reasons. [Kipp must digress to point out that the headline is rather misleading; Bollywood actors are hired to attend as celebrity guests, not quite masquerading as such.]

The new emerging trend to hire a celebrity or two for the big night is big business. According to The Guardian “The ordinary package, which costs around £7,000 [approx 40,000] for actresses like Minissha Lamba [think Nicole Ritchie] is inclusive of getting pictures with the bride and groom. In the case of high-profile actresses, it goes up to £70,000 [approx Dh 400,000].”
And what it all comes down to is prestige. Sanjay Dharewa, who owns a celebrity management company, told AFP “Hiring Bollywood actors to make a guest appearance at a wedding is the best way to entertain guests (…) It displays your spending power.”

Dishing out more than Dh4000,000 to have John Abraham shake hands with your aunt at your shaadi (wedding), got us thinking about the Indian wedding industry. The industry, which The Star prices to be worth $40 billion, is said to be one of the few unaffected by the recession. Whether its event management, honeymoon planning, catering, flower arrangement, on-site wedding portals, wedding fair organization, henna making, choreography, and “wedsites”, the industry serves India’s richest including those benefiting from the recent IT boom. And for those who can’t afford the wedding of the year, banks offer special wedding loans.

What do these weddings look like? Consider the extravagant affair that was the Chatwal wedding a few years ago. When Vikram Chatwal, son of US based Indian hotelier, wed model Priya Sachdev, he did it with 50,000 kilograms of flowers shipped from Holland, Thailand and Calcutta, 3,000 candles, drapes made of 65,000 meters of fabrics over 3 cities, 14 hotels and 70 private cars.

Indian weddings surely are big business, but we can’t help wondering if they are really worth it?



4

Tags: , , , ,

4 Comments

  1. Yusuf Thakur on November 21, 2010 9:21 am

    Its great that they spend money on the most important event (its not a marriage anymore) an event that is all about proving how much you can blow. I would like to point them in the directions of scores of charities in India if they commit to give 10% of the EVENT money it would help those who cant even afford a meal. CRY is one such.

     
  2. VMB on November 21, 2010 3:14 pm

    “Indian weddings surely are big business, but we can’t help wondering if they are really worth it?”

    You can’t decide if Indian weddings are really worth what ?

     
  3. tazz on November 21, 2010 9:51 pm

    Thumbs up to VMB. the tone of the whole article feels like flamebait. if money’s no objection to some wealthy Indians, then’s who’s anyone to question the worth? And its Dh 4,000,000, not ‘Dh4000,000′. If Kipp’s goal is to publish pointless articles, the least they could do is proofread to ensure no typos have crept in.

     
  4. Andrew on November 22, 2010 11:13 am

    If we’re told that economic activity is good for the economy, why is some considered not? If people want to spend their money on something – let them.

     

Leave a Comment