End of the Dreaded Airport Pat-Down?

Could a new security tunnel released by the IATA mean the end of those embarrassingly intimate pat-downs we’ve come to dread?
June 8, 2011 4:15 by shafeer
Never one to count our chickens before they hatch, Kipp is actually genuinely excited about what could be the end of those extremely uncomfortable inconvenient and even embarrassing airport “security checks”
The International Air Transport Association (IATA) recently released a prototype of the new and unobtrusive security system in Singapore. IATA Director General Giovanni Bisignani said the news system means “passengers should be able to get from the curb to the boarding gate with dignity.”
The way the system works, is the passenger, based on a risk-assessment biometric chip on their passport will be required to enter one of these three 21 foot long lanes: “known traveler,” “normal,” and “enhanced security.”
As the passenger walks through the tunnel they are scanned for the big bad things that airport currently make you undress and unpack for–yes that means no more taking off your shoes, watches, belts and LAGS a billion times before you board your flight. The system is apparently going to be tried out in 18 months.
Of course, while we are glad for the new system, we can very easily see how it can be problematic. Apparently those passengers who seem suspicious would be asked to go through the ‘enhanced security’ tunnel which includes one of those highly controversial full body scanners. Any guesses for which nationalities and religious orientations would most likely have to go through them during “random checks”?
More on Kipp's Blog
-
Taking on Abercrombie & Fitch
-
Fake pilot ‘on the run’
-
Sharjah Police ‘steal’ your car
-
Ink yourself for a pay rise?
-
Entrepreneur Diaries: From crib to playground
-
Bikinis aren’t outlawed, but use ‘common sense’
-
Treading the fine line between inclusion and exclusion on Dubai’s beaches
-
Yet another stunning time-lapse video of Dubai
-
Maradona: Dubai is “wonderful tranquillity”
-
Cookery website eats its words
-
Will this man’s unfinished message encourage you not to text and drive?
-
For whom the Salik gates toll
-
Zuckerberg . . . and a screaming goat
-
Five days left – and counting – for Etisalat users
-
Nutella thieves on the run – caught sticky-handed?
-
‘VoIP services through Skype are still unauthorized’ – TRA
-
Over a coffee: Canadians get their UAE visas back
-
Sharing the love: Smells like team spirit
-
Dubai back in the game?
-
Why the bi-annual GITEX shopper is a good idea
Lately on Kipp
-
Dusting off the Emirates ID card
-
Turkish Airlines Can Ride Out Turbulence
-
Taking on Abercrombie & Fitch
-
Red Hat Expands Technical Account Management Services to Offer SAP® Solution-centric Support
-
R&M’s New CSR Report Highlights Company’s Achievements in Advancing Ecological Efficiency and Social Accountability
-
NCoV – First report of patient-to-nurse spread
2 Comments



































“Any guesses for which nationalities and religious orientations would most likely have to go through them during “random checks”?”
The MUSLIMS! and rightfully so!
Kipp needn’t be so coy about their last question. Until people of other major faiths start carrying out a significant acts of terrorism all over the world in the name of their faith, there’s only going to be one group that is targeted.
Controversial?