close

policy

We would like to invite you to continue a survey you have started. ...

Do you trust your insurer ?

Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Insurance provides peace of mind
Insurance is purchased only when compulsory
Terms and Conditions (small print) are clear and easily accessible
Insurance jargon (language) stands in the way of fully understanding each policy
Insurance companies try their best to uphold the details of the policy without cutting corners
Reducing risk, cutting costs and profits are more important to an insurance company than the customer
Insurance companies in the region are as professional as in other more developed markets
Gender
Age group
Do you feel your insurance provider works in your interest?
Have you had a rejected claim that you feel was not justified?
Do you trust your insurance provider?
Our Network

Register for our free newsletter

 
 
Latest News

One person’s junk can be another’s treasure

One person’s junk can be another’s treasure

The Abu Dhabi Department of Economic Development is rightly cracking down on fake goods, but Kipp thinks confiscated goods should be put to use.

1

May 25, 2010 10:15 by



Yesterday, Kipp reported on the Abu Dhabi government’s destruction of more than 11,000 items of counterfeit goods.

The move was part of an effort to crack down on counterfeit and fake goods, and included the destruction of more than 5,000 electrical products and more than 3,000 items of clothing. The Abu Dhabi Department of Economic Development is planning further crackdowns this year.

Kipp supports the efforts of the government to combat the counterfeit goods trade. Many of the profits from this industry go straight back into organized crime, and many of the products are produced by laborers suffering terrible conditions in the Far East.
But we have to wonder: why did the goods have to be destroyed? They have been seized, and are no longer on the market (thus legitimate business has been protected) and in the process the criminals have not been allowed to profit from their merchandise. Why couldn’t the government put the goods to use, and provide them to poorer members of society, or to laborers who would surely benefit from new clothes and other assorted goods? There are many volunteers and charities collecting donations for these sections of our society.

Kipp is sure local businesses wouldn’t complain, as these people are unlikely to be customers of genuine designer goods retailers – their customer base would not be eroded.

The only other argument Kipp can see is that the recipients might sell the goods on themselves. But even if they tried, it seems the authorities are getting pretty good at preventing the market for fake goods.



1

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

  1. Dismanirie on May 26, 2010 8:21 am

    Perhaps there is a case to be made in respect of clothing items, but even so these are products of labour-abusive sweatshops. In the case of electrical and electronics, much of this counterfeit production is potentially lethal, as it fails to comply with elementary wiring and safety standards.

    Therefore on the whole I am in favour of destroying counterfeit goods, thus forcing those who deal in them out of business.

     

Leave a Comment