These boots are meant for walking…

Researchers at the University of Kansas found that people can judge a stranger's important personality traits just by looking at their shoes. Kipp does some sole- searching to find out if its true.
June 18, 2012 6:07 by Priyanka Pradhan
They say you must never judge a man before walking a mile in his shoes, but researchers at the University of Kansas say you may, by all means, judge his political affiliation, emotional stability, social status, skills and his ability to buy new shoes.
If that did not sound inane enough, there’s more. The study, published online in the August 2012 edition of the Journal of Research in Personality revealed that practical and functional shoes generally belong to agreeable people, ankle boots fit with more aggressive personalities and uncomfortable looking shoes were worn by calm personalities.
Now we know for a fact that a woman who occasionally wears high-heeled, uncomfortable shoes can be described as fashionable or glamorous but calm? We wouldn’t jump to that conclusion too soon, given that that those merciless shoe bites and ankle strain make for frequent, painful and less-than-calm situations. Also, it doesn’t take a Sherlock Holmes to deduce that practical shoes are worn by, well, practical people who may not necessarily be considered pleasant or agreeable. Ankle boots were the bane of 90s’ fashion, so we’d rather gift the unfortunate fashion victim, a copy of the latest issue of Vogue than investigate her aggression problem.
The study also declares that people with “attachment anxiety” or people that were most worried about their relationships generally had brand new and well-kept shoes, suggesting that this may be because they worry so much about their appearance and what others may think of them. Moreover, the study says volunteers who had ‘boring shoes’ described themselves as aloof and repressive in their emotions and do not care what others think of them so they do not stand out in their general appearance.
We’d love to ask the researchers what exactly they considered ‘boring shoes’. Apart from being extremely superficial and one-dimensional, the study dangerously borders on idiocy. We did end up taking a long hard look at our own shoes and realized that if we had to believe the research, we’d be labeled a bunch of emotionally scarred, sad and anxious people, given to a fate of perpetual loneliness. Ouch!
More on Blog
-
Sharjah Police: ‘Don’t give money to beggars’
-
Fighting the world’s biggest killer
-
Twist and shout
-
Smoking with child in car banned
-
Gekko’s Progeny
-
Saudi blogger urges Twitter followers to ‘harrass working women’
-
Time is money, but coffee is free
-
Entrepreneur Diaries: Finding the right talent for start-ups
-
Will new e-commerce concepts change our online experiences?
-
Gold iPad at Burj Al Arab
-
Minimum wage ‘unfair’ for employers?
-
Taking on Abercrombie & Fitch
-
Fake pilot ‘on the run’
-
Sharjah Police ‘steal’ your car
-
Entrepreneur Diaries: Act like an adult, learn like a child
-
The adviser as missionary?
-
Ink yourself for a pay rise?
-
Entrepreneur Diaries: From crib to playground
-
Columbus’s Egg
-
Bikinis aren’t outlawed, but use ‘common sense’
Lately on Kipp
-
Mother Technologies appoint Whitehats as their local IT support
-
Flying Doctors India, Intensive Care Unit in the sky at 30,000 feet
-
Comguard wins the coveted Security Distributor of the Year Award
-
Mile-high tower fit for a prince
-
CompTIA Middle East Research Reveals Focus on IT Recruitment to Boost Business Competitiveness and Security
-
Shift in strategy since acquisition – Paul Kenny
Sharjah Police: ‘Don’t give money to beggars’
Fighting the world’s biggest killer
Twist and shout
Smoking with child in car banned
“Your customers aren’t fools”
Behind the curtain of Simone Heng
Chatting with the man behind Dubai City Pass
A business discussion with the author of ‘Connect The Dots’



































