Samsung releases its S6 before Apple begins its process of hyping up its most recent Smartphone releaseMarch 23, 2015 2:24
Afghan resolution tested by its economy, Pakistan, Iran
Has enough been done to safeguard Afghanistan's government from sinking back civil war and then Taliban rule? A meeting in Germany scopes out economic instability and a potential political regression.
December 5, 2011 1:08 by Reuters
The West wants to use an Afghanistan meeting on Monday to signal enduring support for Kabul as allied troops head home, but economic turmoil in Europe and crises with Pakistan and Iran could prompt doubts about Western resolve.
The goal of Afghanistan’s international partners is to leave behind a government strong enough to escape the fate of its Soviet-era predecessor, which collapsed in 1992 in a civil war, and whose president was captured and executed by the Talibanwhen they overran Kabul in 1996.
Hosts Germany sought to signal Western staying power as the gathering of dozens of foreign ministers opened in the German city of Bonn, vowing to continue to support the Afghan government after most foreign combat troops leave in 2014.
“We must not repeat the mistakes of history,” German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle told delegates.
“This will not be the end of the international presence in Afghanistan. We will not forget Afghanistan after 2014. Our engagement will last.”
Ten years after a similar conference held to rebuild Afghanistan following the Sept. 11 attacks and the toppling of the Taliban government, there is no shortage of worries on the horizon, in particular about the Afghan government’s ability to provide security for its own people.
But addressing matters such as how to share out the funding for the still-fledgling Afghan police and army, and whether or not to pursue embryonic peace efforts with the Taliban, may have to compete for attention with brewing confrontations pitting Washington against Pakistan and Iran, two of Afghanistan’s most influential neighbours.
A RETURN TO CIVIL WAR?
Pakistan, an insecure but powerful neighbour and perhaps the single most critical player in efforts to end Afghan violence, has said it will boycott the meeting after NATO aircraft killed 24 of its soldiers in a weekend attack the alliance called a “tragic” accident.
Many in the West hope Pakistan will use its influence to deliver the Afghan Taliban, whose leadership Washington says is based in Pakistan, to peace talks.
Yet there are worries that an array of militants, in the absence of enough foreign troops and an adequate improvement in local security forces, will plunge Afghanistan back into civil war. Renewed strife might also stir more violence over the border in Pakistan, embroiled in its own anti-government Islamist insurgency.
“There is potentially a perfect storm of problems lying ahead for Afghanistan,” said Sajjan Gohel, international security director at the Asia Pacific Foundation in London.
“Afghanistan’s security is intrinsically tied to Pakistan. If the problems inside Pakistan worsen, that will have a detrimental impact on Afghanistan. The continuing freefall in relations between the US and Pakistan makes the situation even more precarious.
“If relations between the West and Iran also worsen that may be utilised by the clerical regime (in Tehran) to cause problems in Afghanistan.”
A US official travelling to Bonn with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tried to play down Pakistan’s absence.
“I certainly hope that we are not entering a phase with them where they play some sort of spoiler role,” the official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told reporters on Clinton’s plane. “We are not proceeding with that assumption at all.”
One bright spot at the conference may be the resumption of aid flowing into a World Bank trust fund for Afghanistan.
The United States and other donors stopped paying in to the trust fund when the International Monetary Fund suspended its programme with Kabul in June, but the IMF’s decision to reverse course last month may pave the way to replenish the trust.
The conference is not expected to produce new aid pledges; instead, US officials say they hope it will mark a start to a process outlining future support to be pledged by mid-2012.
Aid groups fear a precipitous drop-off of aid when troops go home could jeopardise what…(CONTINUED TO NEXT PAGE)
Pages: 1 2