Du and Etisalat: a game with no winners

The UAE’s two telecoms operators have been waging a tit-for-tat war of late; here’s why it doesn’t matter much.
June 2, 2010 3:41 by Samuel Potter
The two UAE telecoms operators got some good news recently. The UAE’s Telecom’s Regulatory Authority decided last month to delay the entrance of a third operator in the market, ensuring the existing duopoly will survive for at least another couple of years.
For many in the country, this was not the news they had hoped for. The current situation has hardly fostered a stellar level of customer service from either company, let alone the standards of technical delivery or prices available in other countries (Up to 20 Mb broadband Internet in the UK with British Telecom costs around AED 86 per month, here in the UAE with Du you can get 16 Mb speed for AED 549 or 24 Mb at a pricey AED 749).
Some welcomed the decision, however. Writing in the National, Rehan Khan, a business consultant, said the decision to give the duopoly two more years to shape up their ideas was the right one.
“While other duopolies around the world are cracked open with a crowbar by their respective regulators, Etisalat and Du are being given the opportunity to secure their own backyards for the next three years. This period of insulation and marginal competition between them should be a time for innovative investment,” he wrote.
Whatever your opinion, the outcome is set, and Du and Etisalat appear to have bedded themselves in, ready to dual head to head for a further three years.
Take this week, for example, which has been particularly noisy on the Du-Etisalat front. The latest skirmish seems to have been set in motion by the build up to the World Cup. Etisalat confirmed its coverage of the event first, leaving Du to play catch-up and reassuring its customers that the event would be available.
Pages: 1 2
More on Analysis
-
Kuwait: expats sent packing
-
Dubai Labourers on ‘rare’ labour protest
-
Tumblr officially off the market
-
A major step for Turkey
-
Dusting off the Emirates ID card
-
Turkish Airlines Can Ride Out Turbulence
-
Air Berlin doesn’t need Etihad’s help
-
Turkey’s IMF emancipation deserves cautious cheer
-
Nokia charging back with full force
-
LinkedIn won’t tolerate ‘unlawful’ activities
-
Drake and Scull chief dismisses speculation
-
Kuwait could sign plane deal in May
-
Abu Dhabi’s new financial zone ‘complements Dubai’
-
TRA denies harsh ‘skype penalty’
-
For banks in cyber heist, how to get their money back?
-
Ending the year on a profitable note – nasair
-
Coca-Cola says no more ads for children
-
Akbar Al Baker – vigorously pursuing expansion plans
-
Kuwait ministers reach out to bloggers and journalists
-
Saudi to tackle fuel subsidies
Lately on Kipp
-
Starcom MediaVest Group Elevates Rayan Karaky to Chief Digital Officer, MENA and Emerging Markets
-
CANALI’S EXCLUSIVE “SU MISURA” EVENT FOR PERSONALIZED MENSWEAR IN THE UAE
-
Plextor launches new SSD with Stunning True Speed Performance
-
Dubai Duty Free wins DFNI Asia/Pacific Award for “Middle East Travel Retailer of the Year”
-
Sovereign art gallery opens at Jumeirah Lakes Towers
-
Kuwait: expats sent packing
1 Comment





































Where is the so called “competition” between the two service providers? I live in Marina and I have no choice of the service provider. The building and most of the area belongs to Du and I cannot get etisalat services. As long as there is this protectionism, there will be no competition and all consumers will end up paying whatever the service provider demands,