Going Green: Carbon, Complications and Confusion

Appreciated as efforts to makes us environmentally conscious are, repeatedly shocking us with complicated calculations may just deaden our sensitivity to the issues, says Eva Fernades
November 7, 2010 3:24 by Eva Fernandes
“REDUCE CARBON FOOTPRINT.”
Every morning as I head to work, I am greeted by this grammatically challenged sign board. The pedant in me always formulates the response the imaginary robot in my head, EV3, would give (in case you are wondering, after disjointedly moving his upper body and arms he says in a monotone particular to robots of his caliber: ‘EV3 Good Robot- REDUCE CARBON FOOTPRINT- ACTIVATED.’)
Though I scorn the sign, I must admit I never really knew what a carbon footprint was. I knew it was a quantifiable measure of how awfully we are abusing the planet and a source of much guilt. But beyond that I was pretty clueless; so doing the research for this story was quite an enlightening, but also a confusing experience. My new-found knowledge, or confusion, was especially relevant given the headlines smeared across recent local papers: ‘WWF report says UAE has largest footprint’.
According to the World Wildlife Fund, ‘The Ecological Footprint tracks the area of biologically productive land and water required to provide the renewable resources people use, and includes the space needed for infrastructure and vegetation to absorb waste carbon dioxide (CO2).’
Wait, what? In layman’s terms, the ecological foot print is something like the measure of human demand for resources compared to the earth’s ability to produce these resources. When these resources are used, carbon dioxide (CO2) is released into the air. Carbon emission in general are alright, but it becomes problematic when the amount of CO2 is far more than the environment can absorb.
Seems straight forward now, doesn’t it? Not really. Think about all the overlapping complications that arise when you try to calculate the Earth’s ability to reproduce its resources? What about revolutionary agricultural methods that may be developed, or biotechnology that could dramatically increase food production?
Pages: 1 2
More on Analysis
-
Here’s to Yahoo being ‘cool’ again
-
A major step for Turkey
-
Dusting off the Emirates ID card
-
Turkish Airlines Can Ride Out Turbulence
-
Air Berlin doesn’t need Etihad’s help
-
Turkey’s IMF emancipation deserves cautious cheer
-
Nokia charging back with full force
-
LinkedIn won’t tolerate ‘unlawful’ activities
-
Drake and Scull chief dismisses speculation
-
Kuwait could sign plane deal in May
-
Abu Dhabi’s new financial zone ‘complements Dubai’
-
TRA denies harsh ‘skype penalty’
-
For banks in cyber heist, how to get their money back?
-
Ending the year on a profitable note – nasair
-
Coca-Cola says no more ads for children
-
Akbar Al Baker – vigorously pursuing expansion plans
-
Kuwait ministers reach out to bloggers and journalists
-
Saudi to tackle fuel subsidies
-
Qatar Airways spreading its wings
-
Gulf Airlines get ready for Boeing’s 777X
Lately on Kipp
-
Qatar Holding, Italy Fund Eying Versace – Paper
-
Tesco Clothing Brand Plans International Expansion
-
Here’s to Yahoo being ‘cool’ again
-
Kindi enters into strategic partnership with MadVillage
-
First UTM solution to deliver combined gateway, endpoint and cloud web protection
-
Saudi government websites targeted



































