How do you rate the quality of English-language journalism in the GCC?

The results are in.
July 19, 2009 8:55 by Dana El Baltaji
The media industry in this region has been criticized for failing to cover important, though sensitive stories. Journalists abroad and readers worldwide have accused the English-language media in the GCC of being government mouthpieces for their host countries.
Readers and journalists in the region, however, are acutely aware of imposed media blackouts, when journalists are warned against reporting on specific stories that hit the region, in spite of widespread coverage of the same stories aboard.
Journalists throughout the GCC are threatened with fines, prison terms and deportation if they report on sensitive issues. Unfortunately, those threats have garnered a culture of self-censorship; journalists would rather toe-the-line than risk having their lives ruined.
Given the limitations, how does one rate the quality of journalism in the region? Should readers factor in government control over content and coverage when rating the industry, or is it irrelevant?
Furthermore, are journalists in the GCC failing to find innovative ways to report on sensitive subjects without getting into trouble? In short, are English-language reporters making excuses for their lack of journalistic skills by blaming the government for their scanty stories?
We don’t know the answers to those questions. What we do know, however, is that a majority of our readers are unhappy with journalism in the region.
According to our poll, 39 percent of Kipp’s readers believe the quality of English-language journalism in the GCC is “terrible.” They claim that “you can’t believe anything you read.” Meanwhile, another 39 percent of our voters said the quality of journalism is “not bad, but it needs a lot of work.”
But not everyone feels let down by the media; 17 percent of Kipp’s readers say they’re doing a “good job.”
And finally, 5 percent of our voters claim they’re illiterate. We can recommend a private tutor if you need one; provided you read this article.
More on Analysis
-
Kuwait: expats sent packing
-
Dubai Labourers on ‘rare’ labour protest
-
Tumblr officially off the market
-
A major step for Turkey
-
Dusting off the Emirates ID card
-
Turkish Airlines Can Ride Out Turbulence
-
Air Berlin doesn’t need Etihad’s help
-
Turkey’s IMF emancipation deserves cautious cheer
-
Nokia charging back with full force
-
LinkedIn won’t tolerate ‘unlawful’ activities
-
Drake and Scull chief dismisses speculation
-
Kuwait could sign plane deal in May
-
Abu Dhabi’s new financial zone ‘complements Dubai’
-
TRA denies harsh ‘skype penalty’
-
For banks in cyber heist, how to get their money back?
-
Ending the year on a profitable note – nasair
-
Coca-Cola says no more ads for children
-
Akbar Al Baker – vigorously pursuing expansion plans
-
Kuwait ministers reach out to bloggers and journalists
-
Saudi to tackle fuel subsidies
Lately on Kipp
-
Kuwait: expats sent packing
-
A maid’s wage
-
ManageEngine Expands NoSQL Support with Redis Monitoring
-
RGH ENTERTAINMENT PRODUCES NEW ANIMATED FEATURE FILM, LIFE AND ADVENTURES OF SANTA CLAUS
-
Dubai Duty Free Honoured at the 4th Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Patrons of the Arts Awards 2013
-
Qatar to announce new energy infrastructure fund
1 Comment



































Oopsie! How ironic is it that this article has a typo!
“coverage of the same stories >aboard<.”
Darn that spell-check!
I enjoy reading your articles on GCC journalism, Dana. You’re only human