close

policy

We would like to invite you to continue a survey you have started. ...

Do you trust your insurer ?

Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Insurance provides peace of mind
Insurance is purchased only when compulsory
Terms and Conditions (small print) are clear and easily accessible
Insurance jargon (language) stands in the way of fully understanding each policy
Insurance companies try their best to uphold the details of the policy without cutting corners
Reducing risk, cutting costs and profits are more important to an insurance company than the customer
Insurance companies in the region are as professional as in other more developed markets
Gender
Age group
Do you feel your insurance provider works in your interest?
Have you had a rejected claim that you feel was not justified?
Do you trust your insurance provider?
Our Network

Register for our free newsletter

 
 
Latest News

QATARI AMBITIONS: Active not activist investor

Qatar investment

Qatar's small team of decision-makers is still too inexperienced and reliant on external advisers to pursue genuine activism says Una Galani

0

July 3, 2012 3:56 by



Qatar’s demand that Glencore sweetens its offer to merge with Xstrata doesn’t mean the Gulf state has suddenly become a gutsy activist investor. But it does show that Qatar won’t sit by passively when a bid for one of its holdings puts it on the spot.

The decision by Qatar to speak out publicly last week on the proposed $71 billion commodities tie-up was a surprise. Qatar Holding, the state’s direct investment vehicle, had built up an 11 percent stake in Xstrata without making any noise.

The fund has been more active than other sovereign funds – it seeks board seats and has even offered cash-strapped targets cheap loans as part of its investment. But making statements on M&A terms marks a new departure and made Qatar looked a lot like an agitating hedge fund.

In reality, Qatar is only catching up with the likes of long-term Western asset managers like Standard Life and Schroders. Qatar’s stake-building began before the deal was announced. The fund felt compelled to speak out because the market was convinced – wrongly – that it supported Glencore’s offered terms for Xstrata, according to a person familiar with the situation.

Qatar is unlikely to start assaulting underperforming companies in need of a kick. Its portfolio contains several such potential targets that it has so far left alone. Take its holdings in inefficient French conglomerates Lagardere and Vivendi. These investments appear to be driven by a strategic concerns. As a sovereign investor, Qatar also has to tread more carefully around targets with government backing.

Qatar’s small team of decision-makers is still too inexperienced and reliant on external advisers to pursue genuine activism. But it doesn’t require many resources to demand more value from Glencore. The cost will be measured in lost credibility if Qatar finally agrees to an offer pitched at substantially below the level it has indicated is acceptable.

The rational interpretation of Qatar’s behaviour is that it doesn’t care if the deal fails, and has bought into Xstrata as a genuine long-term strategic investment. If that’s the case, Glencore will have to strain hard to get what it wants.



0

Leave a Comment