close

policy

We would like to invite you to continue a survey you have started. ...

Do you trust your insurer ?

Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Insurance provides peace of mind
Insurance is purchased only when compulsory
Terms and Conditions (small print) are clear and easily accessible
Insurance jargon (language) stands in the way of fully understanding each policy
Insurance companies try their best to uphold the details of the policy without cutting corners
Reducing risk, cutting costs and profits are more important to an insurance company than the customer
Insurance companies in the region are as professional as in other more developed markets
Gender
Age group
Do you feel your insurance provider works in your interest?
Have you had a rejected claim that you feel was not justified?
Do you trust your insurance provider?
Our Network

Register for our free newsletter

 
 
Latest News

Qatari Diar Chelsea Barracks saga continues

Qatari Diar Chelsea Barracks saga continues

…with the plot finally settling. Looks like the controversial redevelopment plans might just be set to go!

3

June 19, 2011 12:30 by



So two years on, it finally seems like the Qatari Diar plans for the redevelopment of Chelsea Barracks will get the go-ahead. Yay for long winded development plans that royals chose to meddle with that eventually get approved! Remember the Chelsea Barracks debacle that remerged last summer when following the criticism from Prince Charles over the plans to build 552 flats in 17 blocks at the Chelsea Barracks site to Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani, on the grounds that the new modernistic design was at odds with the current design, Qatari Diar pulled out of the deal. CPC lawyers claimed they would seek costs for the breach of contract at a future hearing but the two companies reached a settlement over the failed $1.5 billion scheme.

The entire affair was stamped with hierarchical royal stuffy-ness, with architects labeling Prince Charles as nothing other than ‘a meddling prince.’ Of course, now that plans have been designed by architects Michael Squire and Dixon Jones with a more traditional design in keeping with the current surroundings, chances that the $4.8 billion redevelopment get approved are royally higher.



3

Tags: , , , ,

3 Comments

  1. nick on June 20, 2011 9:17 am

    “..to medal with..” or to meddle with, that is the question

     
  2. nick on June 20, 2011 9:19 am

    “… a future hearin..” or a future hearing, that is another question

     
  3. Andrew on June 21, 2011 6:56 am

    Kipp’s obviously stopped flogging the proof reading monkeys again.

     

Leave a Comment