close

policy

We would like to invite you to continue a survey you have started. ...

Do you trust your insurer ?

Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Insurance provides peace of mind
Insurance is purchased only when compulsory
Terms and Conditions (small print) are clear and easily accessible
Insurance jargon (language) stands in the way of fully understanding each policy
Insurance companies try their best to uphold the details of the policy without cutting corners
Reducing risk, cutting costs and profits are more important to an insurance company than the customer
Insurance companies in the region are as professional as in other more developed markets
Gender
Age group
Do you feel your insurance provider works in your interest?
Have you had a rejected claim that you feel was not justified?
Do you trust your insurance provider?
Our Network

Register for our free newsletter

 
 
Latest News

Service fees dispute on the Palm. Here we go again…

palm

Nakheel drains six swimming pools on The Palm as their hunt for service fees continue...

2

June 20, 2012 4:51 by



When it comes to Nakheel and the age old service fee disputes with its tenants and landlords, saying it feels like Groundhog Day, feels like Groundhog Day.

This time around the complaints come from the residents of Marina Residence on the Palm who have had their six swimming pools drained and unfilled for the past 10 days. Nakheel is threatening to shut down the lifts and gyms if the service fees amounting to Dh15 million remain unpaid. Of course, Nakheel has gone about the matter in its usual classy way, initially denying the pools were merely ‘under maintenance.’

Unsurprisingly, it is the tenants who are trapped between the tug of war between developer and landlord. Kipp isn’t going to waste our breath stating the obvious. Instead we will let the Kipp of five months ago do the talking: “Clearly somebody’s got to step in because neither the tenants or the developer seem ready to back down any time soon. If RERA says the developer has no rights to block entry, then the developer should be reprimanded for continue to do so. If RERA tells tenants to pay up, then there should be a similar course of action for non-payment. Simple as that. Doesn’t the A in RERA stand for Authority? Somebody’s got to end this thing so we can move on to the numerous cases of people who’ve poured their savings into a off-plan project that will most likely never see the light of day.”

Phew, if we’ve said it once we have said a thousand times before. It is sad that the past instances of service fees disputes haven’t yet set a precedent for how unpaid the service fees issue is to be resolved. We could excuse the initial confusion surrounding the matter with the blanket ‘immature young realty market’ claim, but at what point will the sector start growing up?

 



2

2 Comments

  1. salvador on June 20, 2012 11:34 pm

    You said it all what the “A” in RERA stand for? why RERA is though on investors and not on greedy and unethical developers? when will RERA walk the talk?

     
  2. Pete Repeat on June 21, 2012 12:45 pm

    RERA & Nakheel should both save themselves the time/effort and just send the police in to chase these owners who are not paying their service fees. Property investors all know about service fees before they buy property here, if the average tenant here can go to jail for bouncing a cheque then the consequences should be the same for property owners who are not paying what they should. Then Nakheel wouldn’t resort to such childish knee-jerk responses AND they could also spend their time/money on improving/completing their exisiting projects. OWNERS/INVESTORS PAY YOUR BILLS

     

Leave a Comment