Why the net is up in arms

Google and Verizon have created shockwaves across the Internet with plans for what some have called the two-tier web. Here’s what’s happening, and why it matters to you.
August 16, 2010 4:38 by Sam Potter
The internet is always changing, whether that’s through technical innovation or simply growth. Given the rate of change and the vastness of the community it can be difficult for the organizations involved to agree on how that expansion should take place. And that’s the crux of the problem unfolding on the World Wide Web this month.
Google, the world’s biggest search engine and one of the most dominant players on the web, has been working with Verizon, the US’s biggest internet service provider (a telco) to propose a legal framework that would preserve net neutrality. Net neutrality means that all internet traffic – whether it’s a 13-year-old blogger or a giant like Youtube – gets the same priority on the internet. It’s a simple concept that upholds the ideals of almost every internet user.
But Google and Verizon are now under fire from internet users who say that in actual fact, the proposed framework has a huge and very deliberate loophole. Two loopholes, according to some. The rules would apply to all fixed line networks, but would not cover wireless internet. And that is a very big deal, because general consensus is that wireless will form the future basis of the majority of innovative services.
But why do you care?
Well, imagine that wireless does become the predominant way to access the internet. If widely adopted, the plans from Google and Verizon would mean that service providers could charge online publishers for access to higher speeds. This could mean that the products of the companies who pay more work faster than the products of companies that don’t. So, imagine Yahoo mail loading slower the G-mail, because Google had more cash, or because it had a deal with the telco (Verizon works with Google on its Android phones). Or perhaps Bing searches could take longer than Google searches. If you are a company with a web presence, you could end up with a slower site than your competitor. If you use a professional service online, your service of choice may work slower than a less preferred option.
Pages: 1 2
More on Analysis
-
Dusting off the Emirates ID card
-
Turkish Airlines Can Ride Out Turbulence
-
Air Berlin doesn’t need Etihad’s help
-
Turkey’s IMF emancipation deserves cautious cheer
-
Nokia charging back with full force
-
LinkedIn won’t tolerate ‘unlawful’ activities
-
Drake and Scull chief dismisses speculation
-
Kuwait could sign plane deal in May
-
Abu Dhabi’s new financial zone ‘complements Dubai’
-
TRA denies harsh ‘skype penalty’
-
For banks in cyber heist, how to get their money back?
-
Ending the year on a profitable note – nasair
-
Coca-Cola says no more ads for children
-
Akbar Al Baker – vigorously pursuing expansion plans
-
Kuwait ministers reach out to bloggers and journalists
-
Saudi to tackle fuel subsidies
-
Qatar Airways spreading its wings
-
Gulf Airlines get ready for Boeing’s 777X
-
Tee time for Donald Trump and Damac
-
Would direct taxes make Dubai more affordable?
Lately on Kipp
-
Dusting off the Emirates ID card
-
Turkish Airlines Can Ride Out Turbulence
-
Taking on Abercrombie & Fitch
-
Red Hat Expands Technical Account Management Services to Offer SAP® Solution-centric Support
-
R&M’s New CSR Report Highlights Company’s Achievements in Advancing Ecological Efficiency and Social Accountability
-
NCoV – First report of patient-to-nurse spread


































